Comment on Brian Dettmer: Book Autopsies by Beezy

Beezy — Wed, 01 Jul 2009 17:12:46 +0000

incredible!

Comment on E8 by Rajj

Rajj — Sun, 28 Jun 2009 06:44:37 +0000

this post is amazing. cool share. thx .

Comment on Brian Dettmer: Book Autopsies by freakin awesome

freakin awesome — Fri, 26 Jun 2009 20:48:43 +0000

me like

Comment on Floating Castle by Educate

Educate — Thu, 25 Jun 2009 10:31:55 +0000

Arkonus, you dumbass, haven’t you ever heard of this? It is an old mineral fertilizer bunker in Ukraine. It’s considered one of the top innovations in architecture.

Comment on Brian Dettmer: Book Autopsies by robyne robinson

robyne robinson — Sun, 21 Jun 2009 06:18:59 +0000

hi brian: what are the prices on your book autopsies?
thank you…
robyne

Comment on Brian Dettmer: Book Autopsies by Brian Dettmer: Book Autopsies « Dr. Omed’s Tent Show Revival

Brian Dettmer: Book Autopsies « Dr. Omed’s Tent Show Revival — Sun, 14 Jun 2009 17:53:43 +0000

[...] Brian Dettmer: Book Autopsies [...]

Comment on Brian Dettmer: Book Autopsies by Kitaplarla Sanat: Kitap Oyma Sanatı - Yeni Çıktı

Kitaplarla Sanat: Kitap Oyma Sanatı - Yeni Çıktı — Sun, 14 Jun 2009 17:15:10 +0000

[...] [via] [...]

Comment on Brain Cells Resemble Universe by Anson

Anson — Sun, 14 Jun 2009 05:02:40 +0000

Hey guys!
I am very new to this subject, but I find it extremely interesting.
I took “Earth, Space Science” in Junior High (as well as many other sciences thereafter) and I must agree that I think much of today’s opinions on the subject often focus on specifics based on a flawed theory.
I watched a show on the History Channel recently that rated “Humans” as the highest level of a “super organism.” While I believe that we are a “super organism”, I don’t believe we are the highest form, hence we are just an organisms (albeit a higher form than others). The highest of all organisms would be a “perfect organism”. In my opinion, a “perfect organism” must to have certain identifying characteristics. The presence of these characteristics in the simplest form possible, functioning together would exhibit the most signature trait of a “perfect organism”: BALANCE!
In a “perfect organism” exhibiting “balance”, these are some of the characteristics which should be observed (feel free to add others if you think they should be in this list):
A “Perfect Organism”
Postule 1:
It “creates” and “wastes”. However, nothing “new” is ever created or wasted. It is a perfect “recycler.” It is self sufficient in EVERY conceivable way. It does not receive anything (in any form) from outside itself, nor does it give up anything (in any form). It cannot be impacted in any way, nor can it impact anything else. Its signature characteristic is balance!!
Postule 2:
In order for “Pustule 1″ to be “TRUE”, then the following are probably be true (feel free to add others if you think they should be in this list):
1. There was and will have always been only ONE true “Perfect Organism”. It CANNOT replicate in any way. It is the only one of any kind!!
2. This “Perfect Organism” still exists today exactly and as perfectly as it existed thousands or millions or billions of years ago; also it is actually the only “thing” in existence. Humans, the earth and all the other “organisms” are to “IT” as the myriad of bacteria in our GI tract is to a human being: DEPENDENT!
3. This “Perfect Organism” is vast beyond imagination, so simple it is complex and perplexing to us and has neither a beginning nor end.
4. It is composed of (among other things) vast “galaxies” with innumerable amounts of organisms exhibiting some of its characteristics at innumerable degrees of evolution. However, note that all of these organisms (whether we might consider it dead or alive), have a life cycle and are dependent or impacted on something else in some way.
5. It does not exist in “Time”. Time can be measured within it but not outside of it.
6. Although inconceivable to us, it is fixed in size. Because we are so small in comparison to its vastness, it appears to be growing or moving. But this growth or movement a phenomenon comparable to the movement of the earth’s surface; just an example of its “recycling” characteristic.

Comment on Brian Dettmer: Book Autopsies by Cserb

Cserb — Wed, 10 Jun 2009 10:56:44 +0000

unbelievable. simply unbelievable

Comment on Surrealist Garfield by Your worst nightmare

Your worst nightmare — Tue, 09 Jun 2009 19:59:50 +0000

This isn’t surrealist. Blarg Blarg Blarg..

Comments for Centripetal Notion